Healthcare is Necessary for Wellbeing and Contentment

Healthcare: What is it?

Healthcare is simply taking care of a person’s health. The complexity of healthcare comes from the individual as a whole. Healthcare differs from one person to another. Some may require more attention and some, not as much. Everyone who is concerned about their body from the physical, to the mental and emotional aspects of well-being, tend to stay on top of what it means to them, to take care of themselves. Healthcare differs in regions as well. Depending on where a person is located, good healthcare may not be accessible. Getting good healthcare is trivial sometimes when it comes to preexisting conditions as well as onset of health issues that are unexpected. Sometimes it may be difficult to choose the best route of insurance if you do not do your research. It is necessary to check the resources that are available so that you can receive the best healthcare possible.

Healthcare is Necessary for Wellbeing and Contentment

Regular Doctor Visits

Being healthy begins with getting regular check-ups, and following the advice from your healthcare professional. Doctors, specialists, and others in the medical field, usually do their best to give the most beneficial support to their patients. If you are in need of a good physician, there are many reviews online and sometimes, through word-of-mouth, you can find what you are looking for in a doctor. Sometimes people are not so keen on going to the doctors out of fear of what may be brought to their attention. It is understandable to take the approach of “I’d rather not know.” If you want to have a better chance at living a life of clarity in terms of your health and possibly, an even longer life, it is best to know if there are any health issues present that need addressed.

Take Control Now

In most states, you can locate healthcare for your physical, mental, and biological wellness. For the physical aspect of your healthcare, it is necessary to have a personal care physician and you are entitled to choose one that best fits your needs. For the mental health care for an individual, for problems such as depression, anxiety, etc., a mental health clinician can be located in your county or city’s directory. You can also search on Google for a list of reviews for the clinicians that you find. Getting physical exams, tending to your mental health and getting blood work conducted are great ways to stay on top of your health care and engage in a life of good health and well-being. When you take responsibility for your own health, you take less chances of having negative health outcomes in your future.

Contact us today for more information.

How Haven Failed at Repairing America’s Healthcare System

How Haven Failed at Repairing America’s Healthcare System. The reason that healthcare and associated costs for medical treatment are so high is the way pricing is established, managed care. Making healthcare more affordable and accessible was what Haven was supposed to do.  Its failure to address how prices are kept artificially high via managed care was among its biggest failures.

The lessons available from this epic ‘bellyflop’ are the subject of the latest Houston Healthcare Initiative podcast, hosted by respected Houston based neurologist Dr. Steven Goldstein. The Houston Healthcare Initiative podcast can be heard on: SoundCloud, Radio.com, Spotify, ListenNotes, iHeartRadio, Podcast Addict, Stitcher, BackTracks,PlayerFM, and the Houston Healthcare Initiative web site.

Resource Rich but Still A Bust

Haven was a joint venture between Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan-Chase. Its purpose was to use the leverage of its tens of thousands of employees and its expertise in technology to improve the healthcare system.

Managed Care Keeps Prices High

Haven Failed to Fix Healthcare
How Haven Failed at Repairing America’s Healthcare System. Haven was a $100 million bellyflop of a failure, as represented here.

Haven worked at the edges of what really made medicine expensive and avoided the fundamental challenge of the managed care model. “We need a system that enables hospital systems to profit from the improved health of the population rather than the amount of ‘sick care’ delivered,” Dr. Goldstein told his podcast audience. “Innovative ideas need to focus first on improving health. The only way for this to happen is for hospital systems to profit from this outcome.”

How?

One example of how to accomplish this, is for hospitals to offer Medicare pricing to patients without insurance at Medicare rates. In return for the discounted prices, patients would pay the hospital a monthly fee. They would also pay a monthly fee into a savings account in order to pay the hospital bill. In this scenario, the hospital would collect the monthly fee even if no patients were admitted to hospital. If patients were kept well, the need for hospitalizations would decrease. “In this environment, the innovative ideas of Haven would have found a much warmer reception,” Dr. Goldstein said.

No Reason for Change or New Ideas

Haven also failed to understand why the medical business was not interested in new, innovative ways to provide and charge for medicine. The reasons were simple. Insurance companies and providers make lots of money from the current way of doing things,” Dr. Goldstein said. “There are few enticements for them to change and why should they when money is pouring in and there is no pressure to do things differently.”

Thanks, But No

Would the ‘industry’ be open to creative ideas and problem solving when it comes to pricing, service delivery or an emphasis on making the public healthy and not just treating illness? “Probably not,” Dr. Goldstein reported. “The current system of managed care frowns on innovation. It controls innovation by only paying for services that have codes. It likes to use words like usual and customary. Medicine lags behind the tech world by approximately 25 years. So no, in a change averse industry I would not look for any creative approaches to take place except over long periods of time.”

About Dr. Steven Goldstein and the Houston Healthcare Initiative

The Houston Healthcare Initiative (HHI) was founded by respected, Houston neurologist Dr. Steven Goldstein. Like many Americans, Dr. Goldstein is concerned about the state of the U.S healthcare system and the sorry state of the public’s health. The Houston Healthcare Initiative web site is an aggregator of news, healthcare pricing information, and resources for those who want to help drive reform for the healthcare industry. HHI’s emphasis for reform is on free market innovation and personal responsibility.

The goal of the Houston Healthcare Initiative is to be a catalyst for change in the way Americans receive and pay for medical treatment. To cause change the site aggregates information, tools, and targets for the reform of the healthcare industry with an emphasis on free market innovation and personal responsibility.

Why Haven Failed To Fix Healthcare

Forever Closed
Haven is closed forever. Why it went so wrong is the subject of Dr. Goldstein’s podcast.

A healthcare company blessed with lots of money, high tech abilities and really smart people will close up the end of January. Of course, this was Haven, the joint venture between Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan-Chase. Its purpose was to use the leverage of its tens of thousands of employees and its expertise in technology to improve the healthcare system. What lessons can we learn from its failure to accomplish its mission. Here to help reset the focus of reforming healthcare is respected Houston neurologist, Dr. Steven Goldstein.

With Haven in the rearview mirror… Failures to Reform U.S. Healthcare System Are Because the System Is the Problem

Haven Failure
In spite of the high tech ability and deep pockets of the joint venture partners, Haven went out of business on January 31, 2021.

Big fail. Haven, a joint venture between Amazon, JPMorgan-Chase, and Berkshire Hathaway, booted the chance to reform their collective employee health insurance, in part, by not working on the correct challenge, according to respected neurologist Dr. Steven Goldstein.  Dr. Goldstein hosts the Houston Healthcare Initiative podcast with a focus on reforming the highest priced healthcare system in the world. Haven is the most recent, but likely not the last, story of corporate good intentions not delivering what was hoped. So, what’s the right challenge?

The System Is the Problem

“Our current healthcare system is focused on treating sick people, not preventing illness,” Dr. Goldstein told his audience, and he gave an example. “The more people there are in hospital beds, the more money is made by the hospitals, doctors and everyone else involved in patient care.” The U.S. healthcare industry is a volume-based scheme of reimbursement for getting paid. Better patient health is not part of the current equation.

More of the Same

The business system Haven tried to disrupt offers no tie to healthier outcomes for patients or incentives for those same people to take better care of themselves. “It’s just more of the same,” Dr. Goldstein said. “Haven failed at reforming their collective employee health insurance in part by not working on the correct challenge but instead ‘worked on the fringes’ of a non-competitive business.”

Worthy Goal but Poor Execution

At Haven, the published goal was improving healthcare services and lower costs for the three companies’ employees. With a heavy reliance on ‘big data’ and the ability to analyze patient information in big amounts, Haven promised to make primary care easier to access, prescription drugs more affordable and render insurance benefits easier to understand. While essentially getting nowhere but costing a lot of money to get there, Haven shut down without affecting the healthcare industry at all.

Healthcare as a Commodity?

The best way to ensure an adequate supply of anything at the lowest possible price is to permit the laws of supply and demand to work. “But as we also know, that is not what we have and not the way costs are assigned or managed by insurance companies, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies that assign prices,” Dr. Goldstein said.

Employee & Patient Voices Heard for a Change?

The public has little to say about how pricing is determined but could have a great deal to say with the right type of organization. The correct method available to everyone is via the non-profit, employee-owned healthcare cooperative.

The cooperative or ‘co-op’, can replace traditional health insurance for qualified individuals and families. Co-ops can also provide incentives for members to adopt healthier lifestyle habits. Financial incentives based on lifestyle would result in lower healthcare costs by decreasing utilization. Ownership of the cooperative would pass the savings from the cooperative to the employees. Co-ops can allow employees to remain members even if they leave the company. By transferring ownership of the cooperative to the employees, companies are no longer responsible for healthcare and can concentrate on their core business.

How Co-ops Work

Co-ops provide affordable medical coverage through a combination of negotiated rates, low monthly payments, personal accountability and lifestyle incentives. “By organizing their workers and families, businesses of any size can overcome this less than efficient way of doing things,” Dr. Goldstein said. “For example, financial incentives based on choices about diet and exercise will result in lower healthcare costs by decreasing utilization. The ownership of the cooperative will pass the savings from the cooperative to the employees. But there are other benefits that will make those employees healthier.”

About the Houston Healthcare Initiative

The Houston Healthcare Initiative podcast with Dr. Steven Goldstein is an information vehicle for people who want to know all medical options for themselves and are interested in reforming the healthcare industry. To learn more about the Houston Healthcare Initiative please visit www.houstonhealthcareinitiative.org.

Fixing Healthcare Pricing by Using New Healthcare Models

Many models are being put forth to reduce the cost of healthcare in the United States right now. Two of these models include the reference-based pricing healthcare system and the value-based pricing healthcare system. Let’s briefly discuss each of these models.

Fixing Healthcare Pricing by Using New Healthcare Models

Reference-Based Pricing Healthcare

In a reference-based pricing healthcare system, insurers define a reference price for medical procedures and allow their members to choose a healthcare provider that offers that service under that reference price. The price of a procedure is often determined by some percentage, usually around 120 percent to 300 percent, of what Medicare would pay. An increase of 20% – 200% may seem like a lot, but it’s important to consider the fact that Medicare typically reimburses hospitals at a much lower rate than other insurers do. This can sometimes be as low as ¼ the amount other insurers must pay.

When this model is implemented, prices tend to fall as hospitals in the area compete to maintain or gain market share. However, it is important to note that this system will have little to no effect on the cost when the patient doesn’t have the luxury of shopping for the best price. This includes emergency medical attention, locations that have little or no competition between hospitals, and areas where hospitals are not transparent about their pricing.

Value-Based Pricing Healthcare

Under the value-based pricing healthcare system, healthcare providers are paid for the quality of the care they provide rather than the number of services they provide. This system would emphasize the organization of a medical facility and its ability to maximize the value it provides its patients. Value-based pricing would also make the innovation of new technologies at lower costs a must as healthcare providers would ensure that patients received the most efficient therapies available.

For this system to work, a significant amount of work on the infrastructure of the healthcare system needs to be done to monitor both the outcomes of treatment and what factors caused those outcomes. A physician or drug manufacturer should not be held responsible for the outcome of treatment if the patient decides not to take their treatment as prescribed. Unfortunately, without the requisite infrastructure to ensure that treatment is being administered properly, determining their pay based solely on the outcome of treatment can do just that.

There are many more models that could potentially reduce the cost of healthcare being proposed and tested today. Keep yourself updated on the future of healthcare by continuing to read our content, and feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

Why Did Haven Healthcare Fail?

Haven
With the resources of three large and very successful companies, Haven will cease operations in late January, 2021.

Why Did Haven Healthcare Fail? Because they focused and worked on the wrong thing. That is the topic and lesson from Dr. Steven Goldstein on the latest edition of the Houston Healthcare Initiative Podcast.

Haven was a joint venture of Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan.  It was formed three years ago to better manage healthcare for the one million employees of these three large, successful and high tech companies. After three years and approximately $100 million Haven will cease operations. Dr. Goldstein tells his podcast audience the reason for the shortfall had nothing to do with resources, talent or intention and everything to do with trying to fix the wrong thing. The people at Haven were approaching the challenge with trying to fix the existing system.

But according to Dr. Goldstein, the existing system is the problem. “Our current healthcare system is focused on treating sick people not preventing illness,” Dr. Goldstein told his audience and he gave an example. “The more people there are in hospital beds, the more money is made by the hospitals, doctors and everyone else involved in patient care. Ours is a volume-based system of reimbursement for getting paid. There is no tie to healthier outcomes for patients or incentives for those same patients to take better care of themselves. It’s just more of the same.” 

The strategies Haven pursued was to leverage the scale of all those employees for better rates and prices. With over a million employees it seems like that might have worked. But it did not because the healthcare industry is not governed by the free market. Instead, it is governed by lobbyists from the hospital, pharmaceutical and insurance industries all who work together to help make sure that little meaningful change is ever introduced never mind adopted. “The focus is not on improving the population’s health, Dr. Goldstein said. “And ultimately that was the biggest mistake the people at Haven made. They were focused on the wrong problem. They might have been able to make a bad system work somewhat better, but it is still a bad system.”

 It was a shame that so much money and time went into this laudable goal but yielded no good outcome.  A common sense approach to managing the public’s health and is exactly what the insurance, hospital, and drug companies do not want. Given the collective influence (deep pockets) of these businesses and their lobbyists, the American public will continue to get the bill for a medical industry that puts maintaining the status quo as its priority. 

 

.

Medicare for all

Prices
Government to mandate a single price at Medicare rate for all medical services. This rate applies to cash payment at time of service as well as insurance payment. Other services e.g. private room, premium food, entertainment would not be covered.
Providers could opt out by not accepting insurance and set their own prices.
Providers could also charge for premium service e.g. expedited appointment times.
Orphan drugs and select drugs under patent would be provided free by the government. The government could negotiate these prices with the drug company.
Medicare for all
Insurance premiums
Government to pay the base premium for all. The individual is free to choose the insurance company. Laws would be changed to allow insurance companies to charge additional premium depending on lifestyle* and compliance with medical treatment **.
There would be no additional premiums for a preexisting condition. Underwriting would be based on each individual; there would be no group policy per se. Companies would not be obligated to pay for health insurance.
Payment
Insurance premiums would go directly to insurance companies by payroll deduction
A health savings account (HSA) would be mandatory and would cover drug costs, copays and deductibles. Government would fund the HSA for the unemployed and poor retirees. Medicare initially to remain unchanged but new Medicare patients would join a Medicare advantage plan. The government would pay a base premium with additional premiums to be charged the patient by the insurance company based on lifestyle choices and compliance with medical treatment*
Medicaid initially to remain unchanged but no additional patients would qualify.
Patients that will not or cannot pay additional premiums and do not have insurance can either pay cash or be cared for at charity clinics and hospitals.
Insurance would be free for those compliant with medical treatment and live a healthy lifestyle. The government would Collect additional taxes on cigarettes and alcohol to pay for free addiction treatment. (If we legalize street drugs, additional taxes can be levied on these drugs as well.)
Medical record
Each insurance company would maintain its own medical record and provide access to treating physicians. Patients would have access to their own records.
Each hospital would provide access to all treating physicians and the patient.
*Lifestyle and compliance with medical treatment
It is generally accepted that living a healthy lifestyle is statistically associated with lower healthcare costs. By maintaining a modicum of physical fitness, avoiding smoking, street drugs and excessive alcohol use, maintaining a normal weight and getting proper sleep one has a good chance of avoiding illness. However, this does not protect completely from COVID 19, genetic disease, injuries, cancer, multiple sclerosis or a myriad of other disease. Nevertheless if you are a member of a group leading a healthy lifestyle, health care premiums should be lower. It is also generally accepted that treatment for epidemic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension reduces complications and decreases the need for expensive medical care.
Annual physical exam
The advantages of an annual exam include the discovery of asymptomatic disease e.g. hypertension, documentation of medical compliance and documentation of a healthy lifestyle.
Miscellaneous
Change laws to regulate what medical emergencies must be treated before transfer of uninsured patients to charity hospital. A state board should enforce these regulations through fines. No lawsuits allowed.
Adopt medical malpractice laws as in Texas so that a state board handles the bulk of complaints.
Allow insurance companies to sell across state lines to increase competition. Allow insurance companies the ability to innovate new technologies to lower healthcare costs, thus increasing profits and improving health outcomes.
Allow importation of drugs from regulated drug stores in Canada to increase competition.
Advantages
Improvement of the public health by using financial incentives for patients to abandon an unhealthy lifestyle. Decrease the demand for illegal drugs.
Decreases the cost of healthcare by mandating Medicare pricing
Removes company responsibility to provide health insurance; removes the need for patients to work in order to obtain health insurance.
No surprise billing; price transparency
Eliminates the pre existing condition. Compliant patients get free care.
Improvement of public health by finding undiagnosed disease through annual physical exam
Improvement of public health by financial incentives to comply with medical treatment
Decreases the overuse of medical services
Disadvantages
Possible shortages of services if Medicare prices are set too low.
Possible decrease in quality of services
Possible large increase in the use of charity hospitals and clinics resulting in decreased quality of care
Visit our website for more information!

Why did Haven fail?

In regard to your recent article in the Wall Street Journal, “Why the Amazon, JPMorgan, Berkshire Venture Collapsed: Healthcare Was Too Big a Problem” and the reasons for failure.  Haven failed because it did not use first principles thinking. The people that ran Haven thought that by using technology, innovative ideas and big data they could lower the cost of healthcare.

Why did Haven fail?

Haven failed because it did not use first principles thinking. The people that ran Haven thought that by using technology, innovative ideas and big data they could lower the cost of healthcare.

But they neglected to ask and answer the question why do we need healthcare in the first place? Many would answer we need it to preserve health. If you think about it, health is preserved by clean air and water and a proper sewer system. Health is also preserved by an appropriate diet, adequate exercise, proper sleep and avoidance of toxins such as cigarettes, drugs and alcohol. Early detection of disease is also important as well as compliance with treatment of chronic disease. Thus any healthcare reform should focus on improving public health.

Nevertheless most of us would still like care when we get sick. Ok then, what should healthcare look like? If we treat healthcare as the commodity that it is, we know that the best way to insure an adequate supply at the lowest possible price is to permit the laws of supply and demand to work. Our current system is a highly government regulated system largely influenced by lobbyists who represent doctors, insurance companies, hospitals and drug companies. The consumers I.e. the public has little to say about it. But they could have a great deal to say.

For example, large groups of consumers or large companies, by organizing their workers and their families, can overcome this system. Companies that self insure can use the healthcare cooperative model with the “co-op” owned by the employees. Financial incentives based on lifestyle would result in lower healthcare costs by decreasing utilization. Ownership of the cooperative would pass the savings from the cooperative to the employees. It allows employees to remain members even if they leave the company. By transferring ownership of the cooperative to the employees, companies are no longer responsible for healthcare and can concentrate on their core business.

An innovative cooperative can educate its members to utilize independent providers of healthcare and avoid hospital systems as much as possible. They can publicize providers that offer transparent cash prices for services. Other savings can be achieved by the cooperative owning the electronic medical record (EMR) and granting access to providers as well as to patients. By owning the EMR, the cooperative would own the data.

The cooperative model encourages the use of technology, innovative ideas and big data to improve access, decrease bureaucratic inefficiency, improve diagnostic accuracy, improve treatment outcomes. The failure of Haven illustrates how the current insurance system is resistant to change in spite of the rhetoric to the contrary.

Steve Goldstein

Healthcare: How the new Covid-19 vaccine technology could treat other diseases

The news that broke last November that both Pfizer and Moderna had developed an effective vaccine against Covid-19 brought hope to a planet that had been suffering for months from the ravages of the once-in-a-century pandemic. An article that came out at the time in the Wall Street Journal offered explanations for how the vaccines were developed and tested in months rather than years. The vaccines also were developed using technologies that point the way to treatments for a variety of diseases, including cancers.

Healthcare: How the new covid-19 vaccine technology could treat other diseases

Typically, a vaccine is developed using a weakened or inactive version of the virus that it is designed to ward off. Without getting into too many details, the process is long and laborious. Before the Covid-19 vaccines, the quickest a vaccine had been created was about four years.

Both Pfizer and Moderna used a new technology using messenger RNA to deliver the genetic code of the virus, taken from the outer spike proteins to human cells. The cells then created the same spike proteins that were derived from the virus. Then the body’s immune system took care of the rest.

The beauty of this approach is that drug labs can create mRNA vaccines quickly once the genetic code of a virus has been sequenced. The development of vaccines would take weeks instead of years.

The fast prototyping of the new vaccine promises other applications, including cancer treatment. Often, even when the disease is beaten back, it can return in a mutated form, sometimes years later. The mRNA method can tailor-make vaccines that can attack cancer tumors based on their genetic makeup. So, even if a cancer returns after going into remission, healthcare professionals can tailor a new treatment to attack the mutated form of the cancer, keeping it in check and thus increasing human lifespans.

Drug companies had been working on mRNA vaccines for years. But it took the Covid-19 pandemic and President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, which poured money into the effort and cut red tape, to bring the first vaccines to a clinical setting. The number of lives saved will be beyond evaluation.

For more information contact us.

Healthcare Premiums? WHO WILL BEAR THE BRUNT OF THE COSTS?

Guest Link from Dr. CRISTIN A. DICKERSON, MD. Dr. Cristin A. Dickerson is the founding partner of Green Imaging. Her article about how the public will be sent the bill  for the Covid-19 pandemic is very revealing. To read it please follow this link:

WHO WILL BEAR THE BRUNT OF THE COSTS?

Written by Dr. Cristin Dickerson, MD